Fairytales proved a fertile field for the imaginations of the artists of Cybis for the first two decades of the modern studio’s existence, with many of the best loved tales by Hans Christian Anderson and the Brothers Grimm being represented by them in porcelain. They were a mixture of limited and non-limited editions; the non-limited editions are shown first.
The very first Cybis fairytale character was Thumbelina who was introduced in 1957 at $25 and retired fifteen years later in 1972 at $45. She is 4” high. There are four known, very-slightly-different, versions which I have only recently been able to sort out.
The various Thumbelinas can be roughly divided into “earlier” and “later” via the format of the Cybis signature, as shown above. Please note that the green felt circles on the earlier one were added by a subsequent owner; none of these came from Cybis with those on the underside.
This Thumbelina’s dress has a straight hemline with a (not very neatly painted) blue edge, and matching blue sleeve edges. Her hair is a light brown and she has the early (stamped) Cybis signature.
Here is another early-stamp, original-hem version but with decidedly brunette hair.
This blonde Thumbelina still has the original dress hem style but her signature is the later (hand painted) version.
And here we have the final version of Thumbelina whose hair is still blonde but the hem of her dress is now not only scalloped instead of straight, but also embossed. This is a mold change rather than simply an alteration in paint. All of the scalloped-hem examples have the later (hand painted) signature.
The only photo of Thumbelina that appears in Cybis catalogs is a black and white one. The lighting used in the photo resulted a lot of glare against her hair, making most of it appear white but other sections quite dark from shadow. However, her dress hem is definitely straight. My guess is that the examples with either light or dark brown hair plus the stamped Cybis signature are probably from the first five years of production. The transition from brown to blonde hair occurred before the final revision which was from the straight-hem dress to the scalloped-hem one. The blonde scalloped-hem examples were definitely made during the last few years of production.
After hearing about it only anecdotally several years ago, I now know what the 1972 Thumbelina for Armstrong’s Gallery looks like. Rumor has it that 100 of these were created to give to the store’s best customers as a holiday gift; a more detailed discussion of this piece can be found in this post. The difference between this and the normal retail Thumbelina is the book on her lap, which is from the same mold as the book seen in the next retail edition we will look at; however, it may have been downsized slightly in order to better fit on this smaller piece. Many thanks to Mindy Blanchard for sharing photos of her piece!
Another interesting info-bit about Thumbelina is that she and Wendy were the first two ‘child’ designs that came out of the Cybis studio; both made their debut in 1957. That is why some have the 1950s-era stamped Cybis name.
Alice in Wonderland, engrossed in her book, is 5.5” high and was introduced as an open edition in 1964. This was also offered in a white bisque version which was only made for one year (1964-1965) at $40; this piece is quite rare. The color version shown here was made from 1964 to 1969 and rose in price from $50 to $60 during that time.
As with Thumbelina, there were at least two — and possibly three — Alice in Wonderland versions. The black-and-white Cybis photo above is the one appearing in their catalog publications but there are three differences between that piece and the two known retail versions: (1) there is no lace on her pinafore bodice, (2) there is a lace trim on the edge of her sleeves, and (3) the hem of her skirt is trimmed in lace. It’s not known if any of these were actually produced for retail or if this was a photographer’s artist proof.
These are the two known retail versions of Alice. The earlier one, which seems to have been made for only a short time, has a more delicate (and, in my opinion, much nicer) lace trim along the bodice of her pinafore. In contrast, the commonly-seen later version has a chain of daisy-like flowers that look rather ‘slapped on.’
This photo shows the difference even more clearly. Notice, too the change in Alice’s hairline which has been changed to make it run parallel to her headband rather than the more realistic slight widow’s peak of the earlier mold. Subtle changes in the way the hair falls on the left side also make the earlier Alice look (in my opinion) nicer overall. The later version is also a bit awkward in the way that the left-hand strip of flowers sits on top of the ends of her hair!
As long as we are nitpicking the Cybis Alice to death, I should comment that the press-photo example is actually more faithful to the actual John Tenniel illustrations in the second book, Through the Looking Glass. In the first book (Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland) there is no lace anywhere on her outfit and she doesn’t wear a headband. She does wear one in Looking Glass, her sleeves do have a ruffle on the bottom, and the lower edges (but not the bodice) of her pinafore are trimmed with ruffles which in the Cybis-photo version has been changed to lace. I can’t help wondering why Cybis apparently didn’t produce the one in the press photo.
Cybis made three very different depictions of Cinderella. All were open editions. Cinderella, shown here resting a moment from cleaning the hearth with her broom, is 7.5″ and was made from 1960 to 1968. It was offered in both plain white bisque (which I have never seen) at $60, and in color for $75. There were at least two iterations of the color version. The red-blouse version was supposedly a small run with only 30 examples made, although the anecdotal report claiming that this was the “first group” to be produced appears to be incorrect. There are definitely far fewer of the red-blouse examples than the blue, however!
Many thanks to Jackie Sheldon for sharing this photo of her circa-1968 red-blouse Cinderella; notice that her blouse does not have a painted pattern. There was also a third colorway in which her blouse is yellow but supposedly only three of those were made; those certainly must be the rarest of the first Cinderella color versions!
This photo appears in Cybis’ very first (1965) catalog and may depict a prototype colorway because it is very different from the two shown above. Her skirt which is clearly a dark color, and her apron which has a pattern of tiny flowers rather than being plain white. Her broom also appears to be a darker brown than either of the production versions. What intrigues me the most is the way her blouse appears in this photo; the arms are a lighter (or maybe different?) color than the main bodice section. I once assumed that this was merely because of the lighting, but I no longer think that’s the case. And what color is it? Is the blouse blue and the skirt dark red? Or the other way around? It would be interesting to know if any of these were actually produced for retail sale.
After the retirement of the first Cinderella sculpture there were none in the Cybis line for twelve years until the introduction of Cinderella at the Ball in 1980 at $425. She was retired in 1983. She is 8.5″ high. Although the original designer of this piece is known, she was unhappy with the final product that the Cybis studio released (they altered her original model) and prefers not to be associated with it. I’m respecting her wishes about this and am not identifying her other than to say that she was a freelancer rather than an in-house artist. She did quite a few pieces for Cybis and so I wish I could see what her original design looked like!
Another decade passed before the introduction of Cybis’ third, and final, Cinderella figure. Cinderella, Belle of the Ball has an extremely confusing advertising record from Cybis! There is a dedicated Archive post about her because there are some VERY strange things about this piece relating to how it was made and sold. The Cliff’s Notes version of her story is this: She was introduced in Spring 1990 as “Cinderella – Golden Anniversary Edition” at $795 and a declared edition size of 1000. On their October 1990 price list she appears as a limited edition of 2500 pieces…not 1000 as she was declared to be on the order form. I have no price lists for 1991 or 1992 (drat it!) but their spring 1993 list shows her an an OPEN edition (!) and that is how Cybis sold her for the remainder of the studio’s operating life. If you are interested in this piece, reading that Archive post about her is an absolute must.
Cybis tweaked the Goldilocks story by transforming the three bears into pandas! Goldilocks and Panda ‘Bear’ was made for only three yrs (1973-1975) at $145 throughout. The companion piece Panda ‘Bears’ was sold separately during that same period for $75. The standing panda is stamped in the mold CYBIS ©1972 (the year prior to the retail release) on bottom of one foot. The painted Cybis signature and copyright symbol are on the sitting panda’s foot; thus if they should accidentally be separated both are still marked Cybis.
Hansel (9” high) and Gretel (7” high) were made for only two years (1974-1976) but had a healthy price increase during that short time. Gretel began at $155 and finished at $225; Hansel went from $165 to $235. Gretel was sculpted by Marylin Chorlton and Hansel by William Pae. They were always sold as two separate sculptures, never as a pair.
This artist’s proof of Gretel is more of a match for Hansel‘s earthy brown tones.
Heidi is 7.5″ h, Although Cybis in Retrospect lists it only in this decorated (color) version, the Cybis catalog states that it was first offered in only a white bisque version, from 1962-1965 at $40. I have never seen a white one. The color version was introduced the year after (1966) at $55, and was eventually retired in 1973 at $165.
This unusual red-haired Heidi was sold during the studio’s liquidation; she is probably one of a kind. Notice the ombre shading effect on her dress.
A bit of trivia: The first versions of Heidi did not include the tree stump/branch behind her. It is not there in the official Cybis photo of her…
Nor is there one in this 1960s retailer advertisement. Because the price is shown as $55, this must be the color version which was introduced in 1966 at that price. There is no stump on this one either. Therefore, my guess is that there were probably three versions of Heidi: a white bisque one without stump (1962-1965), a color one without stump (1966-196?), and a color one with stump which is the version almost always found today. If anyone has a “stump-less” Heidi, I’d love to see a photo. There’s a contact-form link at the bottom of this post.
The story of The Little Match Girl was one that always made me very sad as a child; Cybis’s portrayal from 1983 (5.75″ high) was a nonlimited edition that was retired before 1988. Pricing details are unknown because I am missing the Fall 1982 – Spring 1988 price lists.
And of course no fairytale collection could be complete without Little Red Riding Hood! Sculpted by Marylin Chorlton (face and body) and William Pae (cloak and hood), she is 5” high and was made from 1973 to 1975. Her price ranged from $75 to $110 during that time. However, this was not exactly the way she was originally intended to appear.
This early press photo of Little Red Riding Hood also appears in black-and-white and color in their 1970s advertising. It shows her with brown hair and with the bow as red, to match the cloak’s lining. Apparently this is a similar case to Alice in Wonderland, where the production piece differs from the prototype that was photographed for the advertising literature.
Speaking of her clothing, I have never understood why Cybis departed from the traditional depiction of Red Riding Hood as wearing a solid red hood/cloak and chose to instead dress her in a white cloak with only a red lining and gloves. The blonde hair color does correspond to the earliest illustrations of the character from the late 1800s and early 1900s though.
After vacillating a bit about where Pandora should belong (mythology or fairytale?) I am showing the standard retail version of her here. The others can be seen in the retailer event editions post. Introduced by Cybis in 1967 at $75, she is 5″ high. This version continued into the early 1980s (by which time it was $265) but was retired before 1988.
Subtle differences occur in the decoration of Pandora in two areas: her hair ribbon, and the casket. In some examples the hair ribbon has a more realistic shape and the bow tails are longer; every example of this style of bow has been painted in a dark blue as shown in the photo above, and her shoes are the same blue as well. The most common bow style and color is the one on the right.
The casket also exhibits a decoration difference. One style only has two colors (medium or light blue + gold), but the other has contrasting ‘jewels’ painted on, as well as a different gold-highlight pattern. The molds themselves are identical. Almost all of the simpler caskets are held by a Pandora with the dark blue bow and shoes; the far more common ‘jeweled’ casket is found paired with the other bow. However, I did spot one example of a ‘hybrid’ that has the dark blue bow/shoes and holds the multi-color casket. There has been speculation that the dark bow/dark shoes/simpler casket pieces may have come earlier in the overall production timeline, but it could also be that one particular artist was fond of decorating them in that way.
Turning now to J.M. Barrie’s classic Peter Pan, Cybis depicted all four of the mail characters; one of them was also produced in different iterations.
One of the the first three Cybis fairytale characters, Peter Pan was produced in color and in white bisque. Both appeared in 1958 but the white version was retired in 1967 (having retailed at $60 throughout) while the color one continued until 1970, having risen only from $75 to $80. He is 7” high. Many thanks to the Museum of American Porcelain Art for sharing a photo of their white bisque version.
A collector friend of mine recently spotted something unusual about Peter Pan: Unlike almost every other Cybis human figure, his eyebrows are molded rather than simply being painted on! This was discovered when he acquired an example of the white bisque version. It may be that the studio wanted to ensure that Peter’s eyebrows would always have a very specific angle; the only way to guarantee that would be to make them part of the mold.
This 1964 newspaper ad for Peter Pan contains the Worlds’ Fair exhibit tagline along the bottom.
This delightful photo in a 1980s newspaper shows Mary Martin, who played Peter Pan on Broadway and in television productions during the 1950s and 1960s, receiving a Peter Pan from Joseph Chorlton.
Tinkerbell is 7.5”high. She was also made in both color and white bisque, and was introduced in 1959, the year after Peter. The white version was retired in 1965 (priced at $50); the color one continued until Peter was also retired (in 1970) and finished at $80. The example in the purple dress may be an artist’s proof.
Michael was not introduced until 1984 – a long time after both Peter Pan and Tinkerbell had been retired. He is 6.5” tall which makes him the same height as Wendy; his issue price was $235.
Here is Wendy who was actually the first of the Peter Pan characters, an open edition in 1957 originally priced at $35. Even a decade later (1967) she still sold for her issue price but jumped to $115 by 1979. In the summer of 1982 Cybis suddenly almost doubled her price (to $225) before retiring her at the end of that year. At that time, Michael was not yet introduced. He remained a ‘loner’ on the Cybis price lists; a November 1993 price list includes him along with the parenthetical note (mate to Wendy) even though Wendy was no longer available. They also stuck him in their “Christmas Collection” even though he has nothing to do with Christmas…but that’s a separate rant! Sometime between then and the autumn of 1995, the studio took pity on the lonely fellow and resurrected the retired Wendy! On their Fall 95/Spring 96 price list, they are both listed under the Christmas heading as ‘mate to’ each other, at a ridiculous price point which I refuse to cite here. Let’s just say that nowadays either one can be bought on eBay for 10% of that amount.
Wendy was produced in multiple special variations for retailer events during the 1970s and 1980s.
The standard retail Wendy (at left in photo) has a plain white dress with a pink ribbon at the waist, pink pigtail ribbons, pink shoes with a blue rosette, and carries a ragdoll dressed in green and blue. As with Thumbelina, a Wendy that has a stamped (rather than hand painted) Cybis signature is an indication that she was produced during the late 1950s or very early 1960s rather than later.
Although most Wendys were produced with both of the waist-ribbon ‘streamers’ as part of the body mold, on some the shorter streamer was hand-formed and attached (as was the single ribbon loop at the top.)
Betsey Bobbin (at right in photo) was an issue of 300 for the Fall 1982 introductions event at Marks Gifts in Paramus, NJ. Her price was $295, an upcharge of $75 versus the price of the standard edition Wendy. Her dress is trimmed in pink and green and unlike the earlier Brielle Galleries event version shown below, Betsey’s bodice has only a single spray of flowers and her skirt is plain. Her green belt is accented with a pink rosebud and she carries a beribboned flower in her hand instead of a doll. The store’s newspaper advertisement describes this special issue as “Betsey Bobbin, a nursery rhyme favorite and Dorothy’s companion in the Land of Oz.” Betsey does not appear in the original Wizard of Oz story, however, but instead in a later book entitled Tik-Tok of Oz. Unlike Dorothy, Betsey does not return home but remains in Oz and is made a Princess.
Wendy in Blue and Floral Decoration was an issue of 300 for a Cybis event at Brielle Galleries during the late 1970s and was priced just under $200. Her dress is trimmed with blue instead of pink, and is decorated with flowers on both sides of the bodice. It isn’t readily apparent in the photo, but pale pink ‘rosebuds’ are scattered here and there on the skirt as well. The shoe colors are reversed (blue shoes with pink rosette) from the standard version, and her doll is now dressed in two shades of blue.
Wendy in Apricot with Flowers was a retailer event edition from the early 1980s, although the exact year is unknown. The color is a very pale peach, definitely lighter than the apricot that was used for the 1975 Rapunzel. It is not the same as the standard Wendy‘s pink. The red pigtail-ribbon is rather a jarring note, and would have been better done in a darker version of apricot, or in leaf-green.
Just for fun, here we have a veritable ‘chorus line’ of Wendy variations! From left to right: standard Wendy with handmade bow ribbons at waist; standard Wendy with handmade bow-loop but painted ribbons; Betsy Bobbin (event piece); Wendy with Blue and Floral Decoration (event piece); and Wendy in Apricot with Flowers (event piece.) This lineup also shows how any given Wendy‘s hair color can vary slightly, from a very light blonde to a light brown.
Here’s something really different: Wendy as a farm girl. I don’t think this was a gallery edition, although I’d be happy to be proved wrong. It may have been a one-off made for sale at the studio during the 1990s, or a test piece. The seller’s photos were very overexposed and so it probably looks better in person than here. This is the most extensive modification of a Wendy that I’ve seen. Her pigtails are gone and have been replaced by braids (that, unfortunately, do not match her other hair and thus give the impression of being ropes instead); her bodice and skirt have been modified in order to create an apron. It’s hard to tell whether the bird mold is from the 1960s First Flight, but it might be. The basket with eggs does look hand-formed (though very sloppily, I have to say.) This could very possibly have been a one-off or just-for-fun piece that the studio put on the shelves for sale during the 1990s factory tour era.
For the research-nerds among us, here’s what the first Cybis advertising photo of Wendy looked like. It’s in their 1967 catalog which had no color but there are definitely colored accents along her waistband and armholes that don’t appear in any known production piece.
Supposedly an additional retail-gallery special edition of Wendy was a black-and-orange version which was probably for another year’s Fall Introductions event – but I have never found an image of that one.
The first two limited editions in this category are from the same fairytale – well, more or less, because the naming of these two pieces was a bit muddled. Both were introduced in 1986 as editions of 750. Rose Red is 5.5” high; her 1986 issue price was $595 which in 1993 rose to $695.
Rose White is 8.5” high and was originally priced at $675. Like her sister, she was a limited edition of 750. In 1993 she was $975 but on that same price list one sees a discounted price of $1550 for the two sisters as a pair. That option disappeared shortly thereafter. The names confusion arises from the fact that in the actual Grimm’s fairytale the sisters are “Rose Red” and “Snow White”….the Snow White in that story having no connection whatsoever to the Snow White of Disney/evil queen/seven dwarves fame. Cybis probably feared confusion on the part of collectors if they used the correct character name and thus, Rose White she (incorrectly) is!
Jack and The Beanstalk is one of less than a half-dozen limited edition fairytale designs. Designed by Lynn Klockner Brown and introduced in 1984, he had a declared edition of 750 priced at $575. He was retired three years later (1987) at $625. (I suspect that there were production problems galore with this one; I have seen only one come up for sale and that was #98.) This piece is 8.5” high.
Although it is the same colorway as the production version, there is an important difference in this artist’s proof: Jack is much farther away from the beanstalk! Jack is only attached to the beanstalk at two points rather than four as in the retail version.
Sleeping Beauty was introduced in 1982; notice that Cybis has replaced the traditional tale’s spindle with an embroidery needle. This sculpture is 7.5” high overall. An edition of 750 initially priced at $695, she sold for $1075 only six years later. Cybis continued to raise her price throughout the 1990s and so I doubt the full edition was completed before the studio shut down. Please notice the lace on her headpiece in the photo above. This photo shows an intact (undamaged) headpiece. This is the way a mint condition Sleeping Beauty should look. The edges should all be curved, i.e., with no raw or jagged edge areas. I mention this because that lace is extremely prone to breakage. Sadly, most pieces being offered for sale online have some damage to this area, even though the seller may claim (through either ignorance or intent) that the piece has no damage. It is wise to compare any Sleeping Beauty being offered for sale to this photo in order to determine whether or not her headpiece lace has sustained damage. See this 2025 post for several typical examples (including one really egregious!) of damage seen to this area.
Fleurette is based on a much lesser-known fairytale from the early 1900s. Slightly over 8″ high, she was introduced as an edition of 1000 in 1981 at $725 and was closed in the mid-1990s before being completed. Her “unfinished tale” is related in her very own post!
One Rapunzel, Three (actually four) Ways
Cybis made four somewhat different representations of the Rapunzel character. The first three were all cast from the same mold but differed in various decorations. All of those are 8” high, and each color was an edition of 1000. Each was issued separately during the 1970s (not all in 1975 as one error-prone price guide has it.) The three versions, prices, and ways in which they differ are as follows:
Pink Rapunzel’s right hand holds an ornate mirror just below her lap as her left hand hovers slightly above. The top of her hair is caught in a decorative round net. Her hairstyle has no braids. Introduced in 1972 at $375, this edition was completed in 1974 at $425.
A rather shocking Pepto-Bismol-pink Rapunzel was used as Cybis’ stock photo originally! This photo appeared in their catalog and also in the hardbound book Poems for Children and Other People. I can only say that I am glad that the studio changed their mind before production began…or, at least I am assuming that none were made, because I’ve never come across one of these anywhere but in those two photos. There is something else weird about this photo: It’s reversed! The actual sculpture holds the mirror in her right hand, not the left.
Apricot Rapunzel has the addition of a long braid coming forward on her righthand side into her lap, as well as one that hangs down her back. The front braid is decorated with a dark apricot ribbon and a spray of small orange flowers. Her hands hover slightly above this braid/bouquet. The top of her hair is a coiled braid decorated with flowers and pearls. Introduced in 1975 at $475 and completed in 1979 at $525.
Lilac Rapunzel’s hair hangs down her back (no front braid). Her right hand now holds a nosegay of flowers with long lacy ribbon streamers. A chatelaine of keys topped with a bow hangs from her belt. The bodice and hem of her gown are tinted lilac and have decorative accents, unlike the first two versions in which those areas are plain. She wears a pointed headpiece decorated with roses and feathers. Introduced in 1978 at $525, her edition was completed in 1982 at $675.
One thing I hadn’t realized until very recently (and many thanks to a sharp-eyed reader for pointing this out!) is that there are two slightly different versions of Lilac Rapunzel’s headpiece, depending on whether a given sculpture was made in the earlier or later part of her production run. Although all of the headpieces contain 3 feathers, in the earlier pieces the center feather was upright, as shown in the photos below with the arrow pointing to the relevant feather.
The problem was that this feather was extremely prone to breaking off in transit or handling, because of its precarious position, often ending up lost in the powdery Styrofoam snow within the packing box. That feather’s position was just an accident waiting to happen.
Eventually, after getting multiple sculptures repeatedly sent back to the studio due to the broken feather, its position was lowered so as to make it less vulnerable. This photo shows the altered position of the central feather; the sculpture number of this one is in the 300s (although as we know, that number isn’t always an accurate indication of production position, as explained here.) But pieces with the upright central feather were definitely made earlier in the production run than those with the lower one. When shopping for a lilac Rapunzel online it is important to make sure the central feather is actually there and has not been broken off entirely, especially if there aren’t multiple photos of the headpiece from all angles.
Here’s a Rapunzel with a perfectly-crafted, mint-condition, completely-upright feather!
The Hall of Fame Rapunzel edition named Rapunzel II is just about 7” high and was an edition of 1500 introduced in either 1991, 1992, or 1993. She is included on the late-1993 Cybis price list for $675 and although she was listed on their circa-2000s website there was no photograph of her, so I had no idea what color this edition was. Therefore, I was very happy to be contacted by a helpful private collector who sent me photographs! This piece was offered on eBay in 2008 during the year or so that Cybis was selling there. She is a downsized version of the third (1978-1982/lilac) Rapunzel but without the embossing on her bodice or hem, and decorated in blue.
Three more-subtle differences are that instead of feathers atop her cap, there are leaves; the two “applied” components of her chatelaine have been omitted; and the fingers of her left hand are not separated as in the earlier versions.
The one puzzling thing about this specific piece is that there is no sculpture number; it is signed simply Cybis U.S.A. in brown paint, with no other designation. There are two possible explanations for this:
(a) This was a colorway-test and/or prototype piece that the studio forgot to add A.P. to the signature it before offering it for sale; or
(b) Someone forgot to add a sculpture number to this one before sending it out the door.
Given the essentially-shut-down status of the studio during the 2000s, with no production staff except on an on-call basis, either of these scenarios is possible. I’m going to assume that, in the absence of any other Rapunzel II examples having come to light, this blue decoration was in fact what was chosen for this edition. Even if the studio did make or sell more than just this single piece, it is unlikely that there were many. Again, many thanks to The Smyth Collection for enabling the addition of a Rapunzel II to the Archive!
Here is an unusual Rapunzel that is probably an A.P. or a custom colorway for a collector: She is a redhead! Her mold and decorative elements correspond to the 1975-79 apricot Rapunzel, although it is difficult to tell from the photograph exactly what color her dress trim is. The seller’s description did not mention a sculpture number, nor was a photo of the signature area provided. The only description was “House cleanout find. Vintage Cybis figurine. Signed piece. Rapunzel about 8″ in height.” It’s a shame the seller didn’t provide a photo of the signature. Unless/until another example turns up (or this one is resold, with additional photos) this red-headed Rapunzel must remain an enigma.
Name Index of Cybis Sculptures
Visual Index (for human figures/busts only)
About the Cybis Reference Archive
What is Cybis?
Images of Cybis porcelain sculptures are provided for informational and educational purposes only. All photographs are copyrighted by their owner as indicated via watermark. Please see the copyright notice in the footer and sidebar for important information regarding the text that appears within this website.
The Cybis Archive provides the most comprehensive range of information about Cybis within a single source. It is not and never has been part of the Cybis Porcelain studio, which is no longer in business.
THE CYBIS ARCHIVE 